One Thousand Years Of Manga Pdf Naruto

One Piece is a Japanese manga series written and illustrated by Eiichiro Oda. It has been serialized in Shueisha's Weekly Shōnen Jump magazine since July 22, 1997, and has been collected in 87 tankōbon volumes totaling 879 chapters, with 9 additional chapters not yet volumized. The story follows the adventures of.

• All Naruto Manga
• Naruto Manga Pdf Download

This is an archive page for Talk:Ninjutsu (Naruto). Please do not edit it.

Jutsu Premiers

I think the first appearances of the Jutsu should be listed, manga issue etc. Also Jutsu from the Anime and Movies should be on this list too i.e. the water swords from the TV Special in the Waterfall Village. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.250.125.31 (talk • contribs) 14:23, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Sure, I agree, this would be an interesting addition. Both anime and manga should be listed, and if one is in one and not the other then that will be apparent by absences. Obviously, those from neither should not be included. I doubt there are any in the video games not in either manga/anime so no worries there. Tyciol 16:28, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree. But in the translation where it says the attack name, then has the translation; I've noticed how in some of them, there was jutsu in it. Justu should also be translated in art or technique. When translating, you should translate all the words. Ryu Ematsu 2:38, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Uhh, the reason that the word Jutsu is still in the translated version is because that is the name of it in the English Anime/Manga, they don't say technique they say Jutsu (Most likely because it sounds cool). Please note the translation version is for, IE English Anime/Manga. --Anyr 20:21, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Merge Chidori/Raikiri?

These are the same technique. I've been updating both, but it is tedious. I propose that we keep sections, but that one is simply a link to the other one. We can do this for every technique that goes by multiple names, but choose one name to go by for all of them. I propose Chidori, since it is the original name, merge any differences from the Raikiri article into it, and then just redirect Raikiri to Chidori. Tyciol 16:28, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

I second, this page blatantly states that the two are seperate jutsu when as far as i've been able to find in any of the manga chapters or anime episodes is that one is a nickname for the other. We should merge them, do we have a third?--Master Shan 02:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

No, Raikiri is for one a seperate technique, the Raikiri is a stronger version of Chidori and is thus a seperate technique altogether, the rank for the Raikiri is an S-Rank and the Chidori is A-Rank, the reason it was 'nicknamed' Raikiri was because Kakashi used Chidori to slice a lightning bolt, though he used more chakra to do so, thus he 'nicknamed' his stronger version of Chidori since it could be implied that Chidori could not cut a lightning bolt. It is a common misconception that they are one in the same. --Anyr 20:09, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

I second what Anyr said don't merge them leave em' be.--71.199.154.43 19:21, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Who the...

70.46.70.11 – original message scrapped: It has come to my attention this IP is most likely the Ip of some sort of bot or script that has been operating to keep this article in a perpetual state of, well... it's current mediocrity. --Smoke Myst

Requesting general Cleanup and Reorganization

I noticed that this was put of for deletion last month. I also have noticed an IP address (70.46.70.11) constantly updated meaninglessly and often repeatedly, as well as Jadzialover reverted the page almost every day. I noticed that this person had opted to keep it and said that it need more organization; while I agreed, deleting every change made to the page isn't going to help.

Thus, I ask that we try to clean everything up, reorganize it, and if applicable, tag the page for at least Quality Cleanup, as well as possibly Vandalism due to recent events.Oiboi 03:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

CLEANUP TIME

It's been over a month since I gave an ultimatitum, I'm cleaning up this article. NOW. --Frenchman113 23:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Actually, strike that, this is way too crappy to cleanup. There's 133k worth of nonsense. Speaking of that, how can anybody know what 'rank' all these jutsu are?--Frenchman113 23:55, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

This would be due to the Naruto databooks, which are canon sources for a variety of material. 171.72.5.226 18:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Yep, all that kind of data is from the databooks (not released in English as far as I know). It says where they are from at the bottom if you would bother to look. --Anyr 20:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

the databooks have registration numbers blood types everything,the databooks know all.--71.199.154.43 18:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Rasengan

In the Rasengan section, there is this: 'Afterward, Naruto was shown to be able to execute a Rasengan using one hand,'. Does anyone know the chapter and page where this is shown. It may be nice to site the chapter as a choice. In later chapters Naruto is shown to use a clone, like in Ch304. -- 70.112.75.114 01:17, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Naruto performs a one-handed rasengan in chapter 258. The two-handed Rasengan he did in 304 was actually performed by Kage Bunshin. ～卍JadziaLover^{会話~投稿}卐～

Yes but Naruto was trapped in Itachi's Genjutsu by then, is that a factor? Its unclear wether or not 'like in a dream' people caught in a jutsu can preform feats they are normally unable to. -- Master Shan 21:27, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Seals

Wouldn't it be interesting to add the seals necessary to execute the jutsu, when available? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.200.239.205 (talk • contribs) 20:14, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes it would be interesting, but most of the techniques show the handseals as blurred together or nonspecific in the manga and go really fast in the anime. If you can get information to what seals are used then go for it mate. --Anyr 20:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

thanks alot for that suggestion! thanks to this, and the pictures of the hand seals from NarutoFan, I was able to memorize the seals to Katon: Goukakyuu no Jutsu =DZiiv 08:02, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Naruto Ninja Chronicles

I am aware that the move is simply a rapid series of techniques thrown back to back but does anyone else believe that the Uzumaki Naruto Ninja Chronicles (the move that the two thousand combo was used in) attack deserves an entry here as well? Naruto (or rather Kishimoto) thought enough of it to name it. Rayfire 03:25, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

go for it!--71.199.154.43 19:23, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Except that it's already there. – Pedantic79 ^(talk) 19:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

No the Nisen Rendan is there. The Shippohappo Shuriken is there. The fact that they were linked together and represented chapters of the Chronicles isn't. It isn't life or death though. It was just a fine example of Naruto grandstanding and delivering the goods that's all. No Big.Rayfire 23:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Saring: Suvar (Seeker Reflect Jutsu)

Is there really such a jutsu? (#149 in the list) This looks like something somebody made up or it's fanon and not canon. If there is such a jutsu, can somebody please show me source material for it? --yueni 21:14, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

What are you talking about? I don't see Saring: Suvar in the list and #149 is from the movie said in the entry. --Anyr 20:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Hand Seal Pictures

Just my opinion, but should we not add pictures of the more common hand seals used throughout the Naruto series? --Mihangel 17:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

I second that.--Geterdone 14:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

I third it and you can get the shots at Narutofan. I don't know who runs the site though so I guess we have to ask huh? http://narutofan.com/index.php/content-ninja%20guide,index . I suggest that it be built in to the Jutsu article, or list it with a list of terms like Chakra, etc. Which would be the Jutsu article. Rayfire 23:44, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Kage Bunshin no Jutsu?

'This is considered a forbidden technique, because it can be dangerous to the person performing it, seeing as all of the clones are given an equal amount of chakra directly from the user.' How is that bad? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.146.58.136 (talk • contribs) 05:15, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

I had the same question. It didn't make sense for me that Kage Bunshin be a forbidden jutsu, when Naruto blatantly uses it all the time, and number of other people do too. But the fact is that it is forbidden -- it says so in the first chapter of the manga. So the way to reconcile this is that, normally, chakra is distributed evenly between the clones. This means that if you're at, say, 80% chakra level, creating 3 extra clones would put each clone and yourself at 20% chakra level (80÷4), not at your original 80% chakra level. And that's just three clones... imagine what creating 10 clones would do to you! Because using this jutsu has the potential to disproportionately drain your chakra and create a risky opening for the enemy, it is considered forbidden. Notice that when Kakashi does a kage bunshin, he does just 1. Naruto, of course gets away with Kage Bunshin and Taiju Kage Bunshin because his bunshin use kyuubi chakra, not his own, thus allowing him to create clones at the same level of chakra that he originally had. -- Byakuren 17:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Now I have a question of my own: Can Sharingan detect clones vs. real? I can't recall ever reading that it could, yet the article states so... Any rescuers? -- Byakuren 17:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

The Sharingan can detect Kage Bushins, as Sasuke uchiha states in Anime Episode 133. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Doomed Rasher (talk • contribs) 14:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

That is incorrect then, because the Kage Bunshin Jutsu makes actual people/clones, they have their own chakra systems and such, the Sharingan can tell Bunshins vs Kage Bunshins since Bunshins have no chakra system, but because Kage Bunshins have their own chakra systems they look like a real person when viewed with the Sharingan, the Sharingan can see through illusions but not real things, I just assume it is due to having chakra systems. And on the topic of being bad, if you make tons of clones then you won't have any chakra left and you will then die, you don't have unlimited chakra and if you run out you die, thus stated by Kakashi in the training with the tree climbing. Most likely reason other people know it is that they were around when the first hokage was alive before it was forbidden, know it by sharingan, or by someone teaching them or learning it with the scroll, though only Naruto has done that as far as I know. --Anyr 20:18, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

It can sort of tell the difference, but also can't, as proven by both Sasuke and Kakashi. The difference between the Byakugan's inability to tell and the Sharingan's ability to tell is the power of deduction. While the Byakugan merely sees quite well, it doesn't work the information out, so a Byakugan user watching the jutsu won't be able to tell the clone from the real thing. The Sharingan instinctively locates the real person at the moment of creation and locks on to them. Though it can't really tell a clone from a person, it knows which is the real one by virtue of watching the jutsu happen. As shown by Sasuke later in his battle with Naruto, he wasn't able to tell the difference when that army of clones attacked him from under the water. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 20:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Neither the Byakugan nor the Sharingan can tell the difference between a real person and a Kage Bunshin since a Kage Bunshin is technically an actual person. And no, when a person uses Kage Bunshin, or Bunshin for that matter, it creates smoke, and the Sharingan can't see through smoke, though the Byakugan can, and thus the person has no idea which one is the real one unless they are Bunshins and not Kage Bunshins. The Byakugan is simply a highly developed eye, and lets the user have more visual deducation, for example the instance where Neji clearly reads Hinata's feelings, thoughts, and personality all together. Though the Byakugan can tell the difference between an illusion and a real person, because of the inner coil system alone. Oh, and an extra note, Naruto doesn't use the Kyubi's chakra during the early stages, he has a naturally high level of chakra to begin with, the Kyubi's chakra is just mixed in with his own, making it more potent. The reason is also that he does have the Kyubi inside of him and can draw upon that but really only in exteme cases, such as having intense anger, near death, badly injured, or in a life threatening situation does the Kyubi chakra actually begin to be at his discretion. (I hope that made sense >.< ) --Anyr 00:26, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Sasuke has still noted that he was able to tell the difference. Even with the smoke, which isn't much of a barrier for either the Sharingan or the Byakugan, the Sharingan's natural deduction allows the user to predict their opponents movements. As such, when Naruto makes his clones, Sasuke instinctively knows where Naruto will move before he actually does, allowing him to pick the real one out of the clones. Like I said, when Naruto does the jutsu from a concealed location, Sasuke's out of luck. It's similar to Kakashi vs Zabuza, Round 1. The Sharingan was able to see through the first mist Zabuza made, and it was fairly thick. As for that last part, the Kyubi's chakra is the only reason Naruto can make so many clones. Even with a 'naturally high' level of chakra, he could only make so many before collapsing. The Kyubi's chakra is what's supplying all those copies. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 00:58, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

No, the sharingan simply allows the person to read a subjects movements, not a real one or not, can't tell the difference by future movements at all, that makes no logical sense at all. The sharingan is very complex, has no real details how it distinguishes from a clone (illusionary one) and a real person actually, so it is very moot. I don't ever remember him saying that he can tell the different between a kage bunshin and the actual opponent, a clone, perhaps, but not a kage bunshin, they are indistinguishable! Fight between Hyuga Neji and Uzumaki Naruto for example, he couldn't tell the difference!Yes yes, that was the Byakugan and not the sharingan but still matters to the argument, and smoke would prove nothing as a barrier to the Byakugan since it can see through things... I would like an instance where he says 'I can see the difference between kage bunshins and the real one' or something to that context, I looked at Episode 133 (Anime) and didn't see where he says he can see the difference, he says he can see it but nothing more than that. I will concede the point with you on the chakra though, it is a pretty weird system anyways XD, and mist isn't the same as smoke, totally different compound. --Anyr 02:28, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Smoke and mist are basically the same thing. It's only a matter of thickness and slightly different particlate compounds. Also, Sasuke does specifically say that he can tell a kage bunshin from the real thing when Naruto first does the jutsu during their fight at the Valley of the End. I could probably download and screenshot the part where he says it. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 02:36, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

A ha! Proof (click here). I'll admit my Japanese is poor, but I can say with a small degree of certainty that this translation (episode 130, by the way) is accurate. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 03:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Well, for one there was no smoke when he uses that, and the real one didn't fight! That was an obvious sign... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anyr (talk • contribs) 04:29, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Still, he says he can tell. Smoke or not, it likely applies all the time. The Sharingan's deductive capabilities far surpass the Byakugan's, remember? This is the key aspect to it. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 05:02, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

We also must remember that Sasuke has fought side by side with Naruto, he has seen his fighting style all together. He could be saying that he can tell the real Naruto every time, not necessarily a real person from a Kage Bunshin... --Anyr 15:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Remember to sign (~~~~) your comments. Again, he specifically mentions using his Sharingan. It's quite obvious that he can tell them apart. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 20:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

(Heh, sorry, I wasn't logged in when I posted my comment.) Anyways, I would just like to say on the issue of the Byakugan being inferior is incorrect, I just happened to be reading Volume 9 English Manga and read, and I quote, 'But in its penetrating perceptive ability...' '...The Byakugan surpasses the Sharingan completely.' Page 117, lowest caption, said by Kakashi. --Anyr 21:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Who's saying one is inferior? I'm simply saying that one aspect of the Sharingan is simply better. The Byakugan has much general perception, while the Sharingan has better deductive reasoning. It's as simple as that. Tactically speaking, the Byakugan would afford the user an edge in tracking, while the Sharingan affords the user an edge in single combat. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 21:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Please read Help:Talk pages#Formatting and stop unindenting comments. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 22:54, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

I just realized something about your arguement...you said that if he was hiding or something and did the Kage Bunshin he couldn't tell the difference. 'As shown by Sasuke later in his battle with Naruto, he wasn't able to tell the difference when that army of clones attacked him from under the water.' Well, then it isn't the Sharingan that can tell the difference between a Kage Bunshin and the real one, he just keeps track of the real one some how, and as I said in that instance where he says he can tell, there was no smoke to conceal the real one and mix them up! --Anyr 05:40, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Unindent again. Again, click here. He specifically says it's his Sharingan. The Sharingan notices every detail. It can recognize a clone through through whatever subtle differences distinguish them, which there would be regardless of the fact that the chakra system is copied and all that. Face it, the Sharingan can tell. It comes straight from the horse's mouth. There are those conditions where it might not be able to, namely that giant clone slingshot move (during which, in retrospect, Sasuke may have been able to see the real Naruto but simply couldn't act on the knowledge), but in general it can tell. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 05:47, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Hello, you said yourself, 'Like I said, when Naruto does the jutsu from a concealed location, Sasuke's out of luck.' Well, if the Sharingan can tell the difference then why would doing the technique from a concealed location matter? You mess up in your arguement or what, just wondering >.< --Anyr 05:51, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

I also corrected myself after watching the episode. Stop quote mining. It's irritating. Barring any overly complicated situations, the Sharingan can tell a clone from a human. Hell, Sasuke could pick out water clones before even discovering his Sharingan. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 05:55, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Considering there were many of the same person, I think I could pick out a water clone. And you just said that he could tell before he had the Sharingan, meaning that it isn't the Sharingan that can tell, it is just his eyes, I am thinking it is a storyline error, happens I suppose. --Anyr 06:27, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Water clones are easier to find because they don't bleed like shadow clones do, for one. Two, Sasuke was able to tell all six were clones, when one could have just as easily been the real Zabuza. And three, he says so himself. End of story. He's not saying that for fun. He can tell. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 20:11, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

I'll weigh in on this. The Sharingan and the Byakugan use a similar mechanism to accomplish different objectives. The Byakugan is a high quality scanner. Sees all detects all. Sees in heat vision, crystal clear x-ray vision, telescoping vision, 360 radar vision (excuse me 359), and pinpoint hyper accurate Chakra Vision. Can't distinguish Kage Bunshin. Sharingan is like a high resolution Bullet time camera with a high power analytical computer on it. It records, breaks down, and makes logical predictions of subjects actions based on prior data. Now we've seen Sasuke say that he can pick out the real Naruto, but he's repeatedly seen Naruto and his Kage Bunshin tactics in action. It is a fact that when it comes to visual scanning that the Sharingan is inferior to the Byakugan in that respect. The Sharingan can be blocked by Mist, Smoke, cloth, skin, and anything else that would block a normal person's vision. But what it can see, it doesn't miss a thing. It can see Chakra. It's Chakra powered after all. I've seen it argued a lot of places that the Sharingan should be able to copy the Rasengan because it can see Chakra. This is a bogus argument. Look at the mechanism of Jutsu. When Naruto does Taju Kage Bunshin against Gaara he expels a large amount of Chakra first, he wasn't powering up he was creating Chakra from stamina, then he did his technique. This is how all Nin and Gen Jutsu are performed. The Sharingan copies hand seals which is a physical motion and it is able to copy how the Chakra is molded 'outside' of the body, to produce the effect. This is difficult to reproduce in Rasengan since there are no Hand seals and the Chakra control creating the move is internal and then produced outside of the body (I know someone will argue that point, I refer to Jiraiya talking about the importance of the direction of Chakra flow inside the body). Moving along this applies to Kage Bunshin too. I haven't read the Manga where Naruto learned Kage Bunshin, but in the Anime when he looks inside the scroll he says 'Taju Kage Bunshin? Why does it have to be the move I'm worst at?'. I think that the Taju is the truly forbidden one. Another example, when Ebisu was training Naruto in the lull in the Chunin exam, he explained how techniques worked. He used Bunshin no Jutsu between the members of Team 7 as an example. I prefer the Manga explanation because it used better graphics but regardless he said that you create the Chakra from stamina, make the handseals and do the technique. Now you take it as 100% stamina, you make thirty points of Chakra and have 70% Stamina. You take your thirty points of Chakra and do the technique. If one Bunshin takes 10 points of Stamina, you can make three and still have 70% stamina and that much chakra to work with. Now Kage Bunshin probably takes the more energy but it uses the same mechanism. You don't divide your stamina and Chakra reserve you divide what you devote to the move. Perhaps Taju Kage and normal Kage Bunshin no Jutsu use a far larger amount of Chakra to use than just Bunshin and is thus dangerous. But note that Kakashi used the move to stand up to Gato's gang with Naruto and the villagers after fighting Zabusa being injured and using a Raikiri (though no one can say how strong they actually were). Naruto can use the Kage Bunshin almost with a certain impunity, because of the Kyubi. He rarely ever used the Kyubi Chakra when making Bunshin. The Kyubi makes him so fast and strong that the Kage Bunshin I suppose aren't needed. I think he didn't even use the two at the same time until the fight with Deidara and he used the Bunshin first. The Kyubi mixes with his own, and since the Kyubi has one of the Ultimate Chakras I imagine that when it blends with Naruto's it kind of downgrades, like an exchange rate of money, Naruto gets ten points of Chakra for every tenth of a point of the Kyubi's or something. This ends my extremely long statement. My apologies if it was long winded by hope I was informative or at least gave you something to chew on.Rayfire 22:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Somebody said that smoke and mist are almost the same, except for thickness and compounds, but that´s not true, and those two are very diffrent for this matter, since smoke is the less reflecting thing known by men. Black smoke produced from fire absorbs about 98% of the light shed into it. Even if the smoke caused by the kage bunshin is not so thick, it's still very difficult to see trough, so, on that matter, Byakugan would have advantage over the Sharingan, and we know it doesn't have, so it must rely on something else. Maybe when Sasuke says it uses Sharingan to know who the real one is, he still is talking about is deep knowledge on how Naruto acts. The thing is, without Sharingan, he couldn't know Naruto's moves and tactics so well, so he still relies on Sharingan, but he can tell them apart because he knows Naruto's behavior.

I said that, and in this case is is generally the same. The smoke is being produced by a human, so its content is basically the same as mist (mostly water, just in a gaseous form, possibly with some chakra mixed in). I should have been more specific. In any case, even if Sasuke is just intuitively figuring out which one is the real Naruto due to their experience with each other, which falls into the realm of original research and can't be substantiated by any means, he's still using his Sharingan to do it. The fact remains that I can cite a specific quote confirming my position, and nothing in the show has refuted that statement. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 00:57, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

The Kage Bushin no Jutsu isn't a forbidden technique. The reason the villagers were worried that Naruto got the scroll was because he could learn how to unseal the Kyubi.

If it is so forbidden and powerful and all that, then how does Kakashi know it? And besides that in the newer chapter of the manga Yamato is using his Mokuton w/e move to seal the Kyuubi's chakra. Therefore Naruto is using his own chakra and not the Kyuubi's to use the Kage Bunshin no Jutsu. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.98.67.56 (talk • contribs) .

The Multiple Shadow Clone Technique is forbidden. Its lesser version is not. Also, just because it's forbidden doesn't mean people can't learn it. They just don't recommend using it. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 04:39, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Would that mean that just any Jounin that wants to could use the scroll then? Or would it be a technique that one learns somewhere else?

No. The scroll's forbidden. Kakashi presumably copied it from Naruto. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 01:34, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

But just like Chidori/Raikiri, wouldn't it take some training? Naruto had to work really hard even though we now know that he has something like twice as much chakra as Kakashi. I think that there was a discussion about something like 'can u copy Chidori with a Sharingan' somewhere in here a while ago.

Trivia not speculation

i'm seeing theorys and rumors instead of trivia at the end of profiles,jutsus, ect.make a theory section at the end instead of puting it in trivia please.--71.199.154.43 19:18, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Except Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. – Pedantic79 ^(talk) 19:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Good point pedantic79 just dont put theory's in the damn article.--71.199.154.43 14:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

143 jutsu

don't consider jutsu #143 a real jutsu it's only in the game.--Geterdone 19:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

By jutsu #143, Geterdone means Oinaru Sakura (Great Sakura). There are several jutsus that only appear in video games on the jutsu page. – Pedantic79 ^(talk) 19:32, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

ON the subject of the Great Sakura technique, I believe this needs to be moved anyway. There is a precedent that all techniques in the games, anime, and movies are added to the list. I have no problems with that it works beautifully wouldn't have it any other way. That said if I'm not mistaken is a Genjutsu in the game. So I think it should be moved to the Genjutsu section.Rayfire 20:04, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Kabe-nuke no Jutsu (Rock Lee, wall removal technique)

Should we consider that as a ninjutsu and add it to the list? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Doomed Rasher (talk • contribs) 23:29, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

No for oh-so-many reasons. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 23:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Absolutely not. Tenten stated right after he did it that it wasn't Ninjutsu. Lee just used his incredible speed to make it appear that he had executed a Ninja technique. He just ran and opened the door. Further more it would take away from Lee's character if he could use Ninjutsu or Genjutsu unless it was something that happened way late in the series....like some kind of reward for his path of hard work or something. Regardless no.Rayfire 21:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

English Manga Names?

Are there the English Manga translations of the techniques in the list or not? I can't find 'English Manga' or such as that in the name, I will gladly add the names now, I think I have all of the English Mangas so far. --Anyr 05:09, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

It's fairly overstuffed as is. I say we reduce the techniques down to their Japanese names and just use the literal translations. I'd also reformat this page to fix the weird double indenting, but WIN98 doesn't do Unicode properly. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 05:28, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Anyr believes this is no longer an issue. – Pedantic79 ^(talk) 21:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Anyr believes that this should be deleted and not editted like he originally did, but other people had to have it their way because they are snobbish. --Anyr 00:28, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

While I understand why you want this section to be deleted, please understand my reasons why they shouldn't. This topic may come up once again, and referring to this original conversation would be useful. That is why Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines recommends that topics be archived or refactored. If you want this topic to end, editing it and indicating the final decision should suffice for everyone concerned now and in the future. While, I understand you may be angered by my reverts, your edits were also deleting comments by Someguy0830. He event went so far as to revert your original deletion of his comment [1]. After a series of reverts, I attempted to strike your posts and say that you did not believe that it an issue. I may have inadvertently put words into your mouth. I am sorry if you may have felt that way, and I have striked my comment as such. I would like this dispute to end on good terms. I will happily agree to delete this discussion if Someguy0830 also concours (as his comment also appears in this topic.) And lastly, while I do not believe your comment about people being 'snobbish' was meant as a personal attack you should be aware of the Wikipedia:No personal attacks rule. – Pedantic79 ^(talk) 01:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

All Naruto Manga

You're progressing rapidly towards being banned, Anyr. I'd stop while you're ahead. The section can stay where it is. It's not going to hurt you to have a striked-out question on the page. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 03:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

This is my topic of discussion, I will do as I please with it, now if you are begging me to get you banned then I will gladly oblidge. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anyr (talk • contribs) 03:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Talk pages are not yours to do with as you please, nor is a section you authored. AS for getting me banned, good luck with that. What are you going to ban me for, following the rules? It is not up to you to remove comments. As long as you do it, you'll get reverted, and eventually reported for being a section-blanking vandal. Leave the section be. The issue's finished. It's not doing you any harm. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 06:39, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Spreading slander I believe is against the law mate, just make sure you spread no more slander my good chap. Heh...bloody ell, dajavue XD anyways, I just wanted you to reply :P —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anyr (talk • contribs) 21:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Slander is spoken. Print is libel. So I haven't slandered you. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 23:58, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Still against the law, and stop vandalising my talk page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.159.183.244 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

See Types of vandalism: Talk page vandalism: Deleting the comments of other users from article Talk pages, or deleting entire sections thereof, is generally considered vandalism. Removing personal attacks is often considered legitimate, and it is considered acceptable to archive an overly long Talk page to a separate file and then remove the text from the main Talk page. The above does not apply to the user's own Talk page, where users generally are permitted to remove and archive comments at their discretion, except in cases of warnings, which they are generally prohibited from removing, especially where the intention of the removal is to mislead other editors.

Also please read Wikipedia:No personal attacks and Wikipedia:No legal threats. – Pedantic79 ^(talk) 18:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Was that stated to me or him, 'cause according to Wikipedia:No legal threats, 'Similarly, slander, libel, or defamation of character are not to be tolerated on Wikipedia. True instances of such writing, which might legitimately expose Wikipedia to legal sanction, should immediately be called to the attention of an administrator and/or the community at large. Disagreements as to the identity of a person, their motivations for a given action, opinions of third parties about them, etc. do not fall under slander, however, and legal threats cannot be used to have points of view enshrined in an article.' --Anyr 23:02, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

It was you, and libel can only be considered such when it's false. Unless you're incapable of reading or simply don't recognize what you're doing as wrong, you should know better than to make such accusations. In fact, I could accuse you of libel and be in the right, but that wouldn't help either you or me. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 03:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Personal attack removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.98.67.56 (talk • contribs) .

Would it be less harmful to u if i put l----s instead? Censor myself? The fact remains that u 2 are fighting over something stupid. Is my insulting ur argument offensive to u? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.98.67.56 (talk • contribs) .

It'd be more helpful if you didn't make personal attacks in the first place. In case you hadn't noticed, this discussion ended a month ago. Now you're coming in needlessly complaining about an issue long since dropped. See the problem? You don't make insults at all. You make rational comments if you feel it necessary, and you check the dates to make sure that the issue is ongoing. Also, sign your comments with ~~~~. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 04:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Narutopedia?

I think that the entirety of Naruto articles should be made into a 'Narutopedia,' that way there could be a complete list of Ninjutsu without the worry of a huge size. We could even have different lists, Japanese name lists, where it is just the japanese names, literal translations, viz translations, english tv, english manga, japanese manga (would that be possible?). Yes, no? --Anyr 05:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

That would be known as 'trans-wiking' it, and would actually be a very good idea. Someone would have to start it, though. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 05:40, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

This should be at the top, I feel this is of semi-importance and should be viewed at the beginning of viewing this page, that is why it was at the top to begin with, I do things for a reason here >.> --Anyr 05:44, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

And talk pages are formatted a certain way for a reason. People go to the bottom for new comments, not the top. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 05:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

New topics go to the bottom. The {{talkheader}} box at the top even says this. No matter of what importantance it is. One reason for this is it makes archiving easier. You can use the + link next to the 'edit this page' link on the top of the page to easily add new topics. – Pedantic79 ^(talk) 05:51, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

The Star Trek universe has Memory Alpha which is their own entire wiki, albiet hosted on Wikia. There's even a namespace so you can link to Memory Alpha articles from wikipedia like this: memoryalpha:Worf. You are always free to start your own 'Narutopedia'. It's usefulness depends on the quality of its content. (bah me taking too long to write my comments. damn merging... also this is tabbed the correct amount) – Pedantic79 ^(talk) 05:51, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

If only we had something so expansive. Simple tanswiking would work fine. It's free as far as I know. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 05:57, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Someguy0830 for reverting Anyr's incorrect retabbing of my posts. One thing to note is that Wikipedia has most of the same articles as well. Worf for example is very complete Wikipedia article. – Pedantic79 ^(talk) 05:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

So the tabs go 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 3? Guess we need to retab the Sharingan discussion then... --Anyr 06:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

No. My 'The Star Trek universe...' post is response to your first one. Not a response to my own. Similiarly, my 'New topics go to...' post is respondent to your post that is the level above it. – Pedantic79 ^(talk) 06:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to the wonderful world of tabbing. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 06:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Told you it made more sense >.> - Anyr 06:31, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

There I'm happy with where things are tabbed. I had originally tabbed everything correctly [2]. However your retabbing, and Someguy0830's unretabbing caused my first comment to be placed incorrectly. – Pedantic79 ^(talk) 06:39, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Tagging 'Canon'

Scanning through the various listings on jutsus, it's come to my notice that it might potentialy be better to tag any techniques that arn't part of the manga as Non Canon/Not Canon etc. It's just somewhat urking to repeatedly see the 'therefor is not considered canon' sprouting up from some, if not most entries. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.19.171.182 (talk • contribs) 00:51, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

(Don't forget to sign the posts, even if your not logged in. >.<) Yea, maybe have a new place under the name before the description, Canon: Yes/No --Anyr 00:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm right there with you. It's not urking it's annoying. I cast my vote in favor of a Canon line in the Title.Rayfire 17:46, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

I have added Canon: No to the ones that said that they weren't considered canon,'cept two because there was a little controversy about it. --Anyr 16:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

I removed it. What fans consider canon and non-canon matters not. No official announcement on the issue has been made. Realistically, even the fan-centered canon complaints shouldn't be listed. The only things that one can safely assume to be non-canon material are those moves that appear in the games, as games always over-dramatize ability in comparison to their source material in order to make for a better gaming experience. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 20:39, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Well, if it isn't in the manga, then it isn't canon, stop rving everything I put. I know that is what you are doing. --24.159.183.244 21:57, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

What I'm doing is correcting your mistakes, Anyr. The opinion of non-manga canon (because that's what it is, an opinion) doesn't belong here. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 22:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

It is a fact, not an opinion, if it isn't in the manga then it is not the original content of the author, it is content made by the people who make the anime. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anyr (talk • contribs) 23:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

The anime is also created and supervised by the same guy who makes the manga, so that's a poor argument at best. Until you can produce an official statement, not fan whining, that the anime events aren't canon (save for the few that are contradictory) then your belief in the canon status of it is just that. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 23:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

-points to databooks- Are they in there? I think not, those are the official ones, aside from the Video Games. --24.159.183.244 00:27, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Databooks are by no means a complete list of all canonical material. Try again. Simply pointing out random inconsistencies isn't enough. This is exactly like the Dragon Ball canon nonsense. Just because some movies are made beyond the manga, people go complaining about their canon status. Until you find a quote that says otherwise, they're considered canon. Wikipedia:Verifiability is clear on this. The claim of non-canon status is original research, because you make assumptions based on lack of information. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 00:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Images

There seems to be a conflict on images, they arenn't centered correctly with the entry it goes with, I would like to have a vote on who wants the images added and who doesn't. To see what I am referring to see Poison Extraction and around there. --Anyr 17:17, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

he reason is the vertical size of the image box is greater than the vertical size of the text for the subsection. You can see the shift for those images are because the Ninjutsu (Naruto)#Dokugiri (Poison Mist) subsection is very short. The image even at 150px is too big to fit in the vertical area provided by the text. There are several places where shifting is occuring as well, but are'nt as noticeable.

There are various hacks to get things to line up a little better. Placing the image at the end of the previous section did not help because the section is too large. Placing a <br> will fix it, however it will place a large blank area at the end of the subsection. I'm of the opinion that if there jutsu is not important enough to have lots of text, than it isn't important enough to have an image. – Pedantic79 ^(talk) 07:38, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Well I can now understand why my contributions got deleted, I just did not expect all of them to disappear. I think images should be placed in if it could fit. A few of the images did not create a shift at all. There are a few thumb images that are so small I question should they even be there. Well, with permission; may I please put some of them back. --Verde830 02:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

I've repaired the article damage from the accidental edit. All the images are in place once more. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 19:21, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Kage Shibari no Jutsu

I noticed while watching the Destruction of Konoha arc again that during the counterattack, that Nara Shikaku used the Kage Shibari no Jutsu and not the Kagemane. This suggests that the older version is still in use. Are there any objections to dividing the Kagemane section into the two techniques?Rayfire 07:38, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Elements

Why was my edit of adding in the elements for all known jutsu(Chidori, Doton/Katon/Mokuton etc) removed? It was perfectually factual and made sense to be incuded. I'm going to put it back in, as I can't see the logic in removing something factua and useful from this artice. Kuwabaratheman 22:15, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

It's obvious information. What other element would something with 'Earth' in the name be? – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 23:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Er, its still vital. And how is it obvious what element a Mokuton jutsu or Chidori is, for example. People for years had no clue if Chidori was lightning or not, and I doubt anyone who hasn't read that one page of the manga would have anyway of knowing that a Mokuton jutsu is comprised of Water and Earth. Or Haku's jutsu? There are quite a few other pieces of 'obvious information'. Why leave out helpful information? Kuwabaratheman 04:03, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Naruto Manga Pdf Download

In a few cases it can be helpful, namely in the case of Chidori or Mokuton, but it's fairly obvious a Suiton technique is water element based. Second, there's no actual listing as to all these different elements, it's just a logical assumption based on their purpose. If absolutely necessary, it can be mentioned in its description, but it doesn't need to repeat obvious information for the sake of a few more ambiguous moves. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 04:33, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Jutsu/Technique/Art

I was just wondering if there was a recognized translation for each technique. On several pages, techniques such as Kage Bunshin no Jutsu are translated in parentheses as (Art of the Shadow Doppelganger), (Shadow Clone), and (Shadow Clone Jutsu), even though the literal translation is Shadow Clone Technique. Blademaster313 21:15, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Depending on your sources, there are several 'official' translations since the VIZ manga and English dubbed anime use different translations, and often not the literal translation either. I believe that 'Art of the Shadow Doppelganger' is the older manga translation and 'Shadow Clone Jutsu' is the anime translation (maybe because they thought the word 'jutsu' sounded exotic or cool or something.) --Pentasyllabic 22:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Jutsu Translations

Hi. I found some Jutsus from the Narultimate Hero series that weren't in here, but I can't translate them. Could someone help me out?

Sasuke:Katon:Gouenka no Jutsu-kind of like a combination of Goukakyu and Housenka

Lee:Mugen Ranbu-when Lee has unlocked the Inner Gates, and he moves so fast it seems as though there are three of him

Tsukinukeru Atsuki Omoi-he activates the Gates, carries his opponent high into the air, then crashes back down

Shikamaru:Kage Gijin no Jutsu-he creates two shadow clones(and I mean that they are literally made out of his shadow)which attack the opponent

Kakashi:Raikiri Nirentotsu-a double Raikiri attack

Ohorodzuki-Kakashi sends his dogs to attack the enemy multiple times, then he dives downward, slashing with his ANBU sword

Orochimaru:Kinjutsu:Edofumetsu-like the Edotensei, but a bunch of shadowy hands come out of the coffin and drag the opponent in

Tenten:Sougu:Fujinheki-she lays both scrolls in front of her, and various weapons pop out of the ground, moving towards the opponent, sending him/her into the air, then Tenten uses a chain to drag them back down

Choji:Chobaika no Jutsu-when Choji becomes a giant

Shino:Kikaichu Yajiri-the bugs swarm the opponent from behind, incasing him/her in a shield while they drain their energy

Gai:Kake Agaru Atsuki Tamashi!!!-Gai activates the Inner Gates, punches his opponent into the air, then dashes up, and forcefully punches them back down, resulting in an explosion

Shizune:Daikoushou-a combo attack with Tonton. Tonton charges at the opponent, pushing him back, then Shizune creates two giant chakra blades, which she sends along the ground to hit the enemy

Sakon:Kuchiyose:Rashoumon Naraku-Sakon and Ukon summon the Rashoumon gate underneath the opponent, which opens and swallows them, then unleashes a huge amout of black energy

Kimimaro:Yaemugura no Mai-Kimimaro attacks with two bone swords, jabbing the enemy backwards, then dashes behind them and unleashes a ton of bone spikes from his body

Nidaime Hokage:Suiton:Koukasuijin no Jutsu-he creates a whirlpool with the enemy inside, then sends a water spike into the center

I think there's more, but I'll send them if I find them.

Also, could you tell me which ones would be sutable for posting? Just to be sure.

TimeReaper

IMHO none of the game jutsu should be posted, but that's just me. And also, it's gonna be tough translating most of those without at least approximate meanings, due to the way Japanese is. --Pentasyllabic 23:55, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

I recognize a few of those. Lee's cloning thing is a taijutsu. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 00:09, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

powerfull rasengan

which is stronger odama rasengan or ultra rasengan?--71.199.154.43 21:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Odama by far.Rayfire 03:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Splitting the Article

How about splitting the article into several different articles, one for canon jutsus, one for anime/OVA only jutsus, and one for video game-only jutsus. It makes it easier to differentiate between canon and fanon.--24.149.204.116 23:30, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm all for removing the video game jutsu (which I've said before a few times) but I'd also settle for separating canon (have appeared at least in the manga) and non-canon (not used in manga) jutsu, similar to i.e. Spells in Harry Potter (novels) and Non-canonical spells in Harry Potter (films or games only). --Pentasyllabic 17:40, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

I've got that half done. Unfortunately, it does little good. I swear, all the complaints about canon and what happens? Only 60 some-odd moves out of 230 are actually not present n the manga, – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 19:35, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, the article could be further divided by alphabetical order or by some categorization (see Talk:Jutsu (Naruto)#Organization for a previous discussion and ideas, which unfortunately never got implemented.) --Pentasyllabic 19:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

How about by rank? That's should be sufficiently varied to insure an even distribution. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 19:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

I am all for splitting the article. i think that it would make it much easier to navigate through the moves. I like the canon and non-canon idea like Spells in Harry Potter and the other one.Orochimaru10 14:18, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

That wouldn't make a big difference. Only sixty-ish are non-manga. Preferably, the article should be cut in half. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 19:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

I think dividing the page up alphabetically, into two or even three sections is a better idea than sorting by rank (also, a lot of the new techniques don't have an official rank yet.) --Pentasyllabic 19:35, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

After sorting through, Id say we can divide it into 3 sections for the manga techniques (A-G, H-R, S-Z) and another for the non-manga techniques. It'll produce four pages with about 60 techniques a page. The last two will be slightly more while the other two would be less. Is there some other article that's divided by alphabhet? I'd like an example before carving it up. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 19:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Here's an example from Special:Longpages: List of townships in Minnesota divides up the list into A-M and N-Z. Seems straightforward enough. --Pentasyllabic 20:15, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

This should be close. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 20:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Third Hokage

He allegedly knows every Konoha technique, so should he be listed under a lot more Jutsus?

• That's a good point, but I'm not sure it's verifiable. Considering the number of clans with secret techniques. It's unreasonable to assume that he knows the Nara family's Shadow techniques, Kakashi's Chidori, or Yondaime's Rasengan. He doesn't have the fat for teh Akimichi's Baika no Jutsu, no Byakugan for the Hyuga Juken, and he wasn't sacrificed to bugs like Aburames at birth. As for other techniques he may have simply replaced them with more powerful techniques his dragon bullet technique over the Grand Fireball for instance. Regardless I don't think that the rules of this place can justify adding his name to lists when there is no blatant evidence. Aside from that if you put his name on every technique that qualifies it would just be redundant. He was a genius, the God of Shinobi....we should just leave it at that.Rayfire 03:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Amaterasu

You shouldn't translate Amaterasu aka Shining Heaven. Even though it is translatable, remember that it is a proper name of the Sun Goddess. The same goes for Tsukiyomi. On a personal nopte when it gets to that point in the english Anime I pray they don't have Naruto scream Spiralling Sphere! That would be painful.Rayfire 03:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

When we know the translations we'll decide whether or not to translate it back. I merely wanted to be consistent in renaming the sections. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 03:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

I do agree with your sentiment, though. I do hope they at least have the sense to keep some of the simpler names the same, especially in those cases where they serve as an effective nickname. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 05:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

I think you should keep stuff like amaterasu in it's japanese form until it has been shown in the enlish anime how they say it. Because if they haven't used it yet, the people who watched subbed naruto will make better use than those who don't. Like a person who only watched English anime will not look up amaterasu, but someone who watches subbed might. And for example, if I want to look up amaterasu, how will i know 'shining heaven' directs to amaterasu? maybe at least do Amaterasu (Shining Heaven) or something68.4.254.80 11:21, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Why were all of the 'jutsu' translated to 'technique?' I can understand literal translations, but we already know that the 'jutsu' in the names are left untranslated.75.20.201.115 00:16, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

'Jutsu' isn't left untranslated you idiot, I'm so tired of these stupid people who can't translate properly. I don't even know Japanese but I already figured out that 'Katon, Goukakyuu No Jutsu' means 'Fire-type, Technique Of Powerful Fireball'. Because 'jutsu' means 'tecnique' and 'no' means 'of', and when used in a sentance, like 'no jutsu' it's translated as 'technique of', when used as 'jutsu no' it's transalted as 'of technique'. SO, 'Katon, Goukakyuu No Jutsu' is 'Fire-type, Technique of Powerful Fireball', NOT F@CKING 'FIRE RELEASE, GRAND FIREBALL JUTSU/TECHNIQUE'!

Because I'm lazy and didn't bother switching every instance of 'techinque' in the title. I put Amaterasu back. – Someguy0830 (Talk contribs) 00:35, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Naruto Shippuden the Movie: The Lost Tower (劇場版 Naruto-ナルト-疾風伝 ザ・ロストタワーGekijōban Naruto Shippūden: Za Rosuto Tawā) is a 2010 Japanese animated film based on Masashi Kishimoto's manga and animeseries. It was released on July 31, 2010.^[1] Along with the film, a comical short feature named Naruto, the Genie, and the Three Wishes!! (劇場版NARUTO-ナルト-そよ風伝　ナルトと魔神と3つのお願いだってばよ！！Gekijōban Naruto Soyokazeden: Naruto to mashin to mitsu no onegai dattebayo!!) was also shown. The theme song 'if' is performed by Kana Nishino. The film was released in North America on September 17, 2013 by Viz Media.

Plot[edit]

Assigned a mission to capture a missing-nin named Mukade, Naruto Uzumaki, Sakura Haruno, Yamato and Sai wield chakra-knives. At the one thousand year old city ruins of Loran, they confront Mukade attempting to dominate the Ninja World with the power of the Ryūmyaku (the Ley Line in English), an ancient chakra flowing deep underground. He breaks Minato Namikaze's seal to unleash the power, causing the light to engulf Naruto and Yamato, before Sai and Sakura ride on an ink bird and attempt to escape.

Naruto and Yamato are sent twenty years into the past. When Naruto awakens from this time slip, he meets the queen of Loran, Sāra. It is later revealed that Mukade traveled to the past six years before Naruto and changed his name to Anrokuzan, the minister of Loran who killed Sāra's mother Sēramu. Naruto agrees to protect Sāra, after Anrokuzan declares about the kidnapped citizens and creates to summon the 'Puppet Ninja Forces'. Minato, Shibi Aburame, Chōza Akimichi and Kakashi Hatake, on their own mission to stop Anrokuzan, appear to support the heroes. While they rescue Sara's people and Naruto holds Minato's kunai, Sāra recalls her memory about Sēramu's lullaby. Anrokuzan uses the parts of the tower to become a giant defensive puppet. Minato and Naruto use their regenerative chakra enough to create the legendary Super Rasengan. After Sāra disables Anrokuzan's technique, Minato exposes Anrokuzan's weak spot and Naruto destroys it. As Yamato and Kakashi rescue Naruto and Sāra, Minato uses the kunai to completely seal off the power. Just as the heroes vanish from the past, Minato asks Naruto not to change history by erasing all of their memories.

With Mukade gone, Sakura and Sai reunite with Naruto and Yamato in the present. As they are about to leave the ruins, they run into Queen Sāra's daughter, who kept the old chakra blade that belonged to Naruto. She informs that it was given to her mother by a 'hero in a dream'. Naruto recognizes his blade, reaches out to his back where he usually keeps his blade but it isn't there. He's left dumbfounded.

Cast[edit]

Home media[edit]

The film was released on DVD on April 27, 2011.

References[edit]

1. ^'西野カナ、新曲は劇場版「Naruto」主題歌' [Kana Nishino's New Song Is the Theme of the Film Naruto]. Oricon Style (in Japanese). Oricon. June 15, 2010. Retrieved June 19, 2010.

External links[edit]

• Gekijouban Naruto Shippuuden: Za rosuto tawâ on IMDb
• Naruto Shippuden the Movie: The Lost Tower at Anime News Network's encyclopedia