Vroom 1964 Expectancy Theory Pdf To Word
admin 02.09.2019
- Arvey, R.: 1972, 'Task Performance as a Function of Perceived Effort-Performance and Performance-Reward Contingencies', Organizational Behavior and Human Performance8, 423–433.Google Scholar
- Badaracco, J. L. and A. P. Webb: 1995, 'Business Ethics: A View from the Trenches', California Management Review37(2), 8–28.Google Scholar
- Baier, A.: 1985, 'Doing Without Moral Theory?', in A. Baier (ed.), Postures of the Mind: Essays on Mind and Morals (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis), pp. 228–245.Google Scholar
- Bayles, M. (ed.): 1968, Contemporary Utilitarianism (Anchor Books, New York).Google Scholar
- Berenbeim, R. E.: 1992, Corporate Ethics Practices (The Conference Board, Report No. 986, New York).Google Scholar
- Blodgett, T. B.: 1968, 'Showdown on “Business Bluffing” (Special Report)', Harvard Business Review46(3), 162–170.Google Scholar
- Brayfield, A. H. and W. H. Crockett: 1955, 'Employee Attitudes and Employee Performance', Psychology Bulletin52, 396–424.Google Scholar
- Brothers, T. (ed.): 1991, Corporate Ethics: Developing New Standards of Accountability (The Conference Board, Report No. 980, New York).Google Scholar
- Carr, A. Z.: 1968, 'Is Business Bluffing Ethical?', Harvard Business Review46(1), 143–153.Google Scholar
- Fromson, B.: 1990, 'Did Drexel Get What it Deserved?', Fortune (March 12), 81–88.Google Scholar
- Georgopoulos, B. S., G. M. Mahoney and N. W. Jones: 1957, 'A Path-Goal Approach to Productivity', Journal of Applied Psychology41, 345–353.Google Scholar
- Harrell, A. M. and M. J. Stahl: 1984, 'Modeling Managers' Effort-Level Decisions for a Within-Persons Examination of Expectancy Theory in a Budget Setting', Decision Sciences15, 52–73.Google Scholar
- Herzberg, F., G. Mausner, R. O. Peterson and D. R. Capwell: 1957, Job Attitudes: Review of Research and Opinion (Psychological Service of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).Google Scholar
- Hope, J. W. and L. E. Pate: 1988, 'A Cognitive-Expectancy Analysis of Compliance Decisions', Human Relations41, 739–751.Google Scholar
- Jorgenson, D. O., M. D. Dunnette and R. D. Pritchard: 1973, 'Effects of the Manipulation of a Performance-Reward Contingency on Behavior in a Simulated Work Setting', Journal of Applied Psychology57, 271–280.Google Scholar
- Kant, I.: 1785, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, tr. James Ellington (Hackett Publishing Co., Indianapolis, 1981).Google Scholar
- Klein, H. J.: 1991, 'Further Evidence on the Relationship between Goal Setting and Expectancy Theories', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes49, 230–257.Google Scholar
- Lawler, E. E. and L. W. Porter: 1967, 'Antecedent Attitudes of Effective Managerial Performance', Organizational Behavior and Human Performance2, 122–142.Google Scholar
- Lawler, E. E.: 1970, 'Job Attitudes and Employee Motivation: Theory, Research, and Practice', Personnel Psychology23, 223–237.Google Scholar
- Lewin, K.: 1951, 'Behavior and Development as a Function of the Total Situation', in D. Cartwright (ed.), Field Theory in Social Sciences: Selected Theoretical Papers (Harper & Row, New York), pp. 238–303.Google Scholar
- Maremont, M.: 1995, 'Blind Ambition', Business Week (October 23), 79–92.Google Scholar
- Nadler, D. and E. E. Lawler: 1977, 'Motivation: A Diagnostic Approach', in J. R. Hackman, E. E. Lawler and L. W. Porter (eds.), Perspectives on Behavior in Organizations (McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York), pp. 26–36.Google Scholar
- Nelson, K. A.: 1991, 'The Game: Integrating Corporate Standards Worldwide', in T. Brothers (ed.), Corporate Ethics: Developing New Standards of Accountability (The Conference Board, Report No. 980, New York), pp. 27–28.Google Scholar
- Pritchard, R. D. and M. S. Sanders: 1973, 'The Influence of Valence, Instrumentality, and Expectancy on Effort and Performance', Journal of Applied Psychology57, 55–60.Google Scholar
- Schuh, A. J.: 1967, 'The Predictability of Employee Tenure: A Review of the Literature', Personnel Psychology20, 133–152.Google Scholar
- Snead, K. C. and A. M. Harrell: 1994, 'An Application of Expectancy Theory to Explain a Manager' Intention to Use a Decision Support System', Decision Sciences25, 499–513.Google Scholar
- Spagnola, S. S: 1992, 'Human Resources Programs for New and Old Employees', in T. Brothers (ed.), Corporate Ethics: Developing New Standards of Accountability (The Conference Board, Report No. 980, New York), pp. 19–20.Google Scholar
- Stocker, M.: 1973, 'Act and Agent Evaluations', Review of Metaphysics27, 42–61.Google Scholar
- Stocker, M.: 1976, 'The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories', Journal of Philosophy3, 453–466.Google Scholar
- Vroom, V.: 1964, Work and Motivation (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York).Google Scholar

Vroom Expectancy Theory Pdf
Vroom's expectancy theory assumes that behavior results from conscious choices among alternatives whose purpose it is to maximize pleasure and to minimize pain. Download lagu naruto shippuden opening 14 tsuki no ookisa. Vroom realized that an employee's performance is based on individual factors such as personality, skills, knowledge, experience and abilities.